docs(gap): integrate visual and owner-handoff evidence - #1602
docs(gap): integrate visual and owner-handoff evidence#1602seonghobae wants to merge 13 commits into
Conversation
Move the inspected smoke findings into a dedicated gap-owner lane and link each observed defect to its proposed successor and remaining acceptance proof. Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe baseline records updated hosted workflow evidence for ChangesBaseline documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The documentation baseline update has no identified merge-blocking risk. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Visual Inspection receipt (exact head |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
Independent Visual Inspection completed by main: retrieved artifact10042037726 from Application CI run34189161122, name naruon-full-product-smoke-1600-d30f0b7c403bcf2b06d84b27f2744d5c17177294. Opened every retained PNG directly:10/10 desktop images,1440x1024 (home,mail,calendar,tasks,projects,search,data,security,settings,ai-hub). Confirmed English skip-link on Home/Projects/Security; source-linked Home copy; raw source/thread and sender_context in Search; intent/ETag/If-Match copy in Calendar; verifier command/schema/exit-code copy in Data; signed-session and event-code copy in Security; Settings content behind fixed header; clipped Projects nav and Mail toast covering primary navigation. These are mocked CI screenshots, not live provider/write evidence. This artifact contains10 desktop images, no mobile images; the earlier20-image local observation remains a distinct receipt. AGENTS successor is #15491261c32. Product visual acceptance is not established by artifact availability. |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
…com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon into codex/visual-gap-evidence-successor
|
@coderabbitai review 현재 exact head |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo '== checked-out commit =='
git rev-parse HEAD
git status --short
echo '== PR metadata =='
gh pr view 1602 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/naruon \
--json number,state,isDraft,baseRefOid,headRefOid,headRefName,url \
--jq '.'
echo '== merge-base and changed files =='
base="$(git merge-base HEAD origin/develop)"
printf 'merge-base=%s\n' "$base"
git diff --stat "$base"...HEAD
git diff --name-status "$base"...HEAD
echo '== document diff =='
git diff --find-renames --unified=60 "$base"...HEAD -- docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
echo '== document outline and relevant lines =='
rg -n -C 5 '(v1\.3|1603|Search|visual|artifact|acceptance)' docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
echo '== referenced PR metadata =='
for pr in 1578 1599 1600 1601 1603; do
printf '\n#%s\n' "$pr"
gh pr view "$pr" --repo ContextualWisdomLab/naruon \
--json number,state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,url,title \
--jq '.'
doneLength of output: 25960 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/naruon"
echo '== `#1602` exact-head workflow runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/d186427fe52fcee9d62329d56f632369ba7d79ef/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | [.name, .status, .conclusion, .details_url] | `@tsv`'
echo '== `#1602` reviews and review comments =='
gh pr view 1602 --repo "$repo" --json reviews,comments \
--jq '{reviews: [.reviews[] | {author: .author.login, state: .state, commit: .commit.oid}], comments: [.comments[] | {author: .author.login, body: .body}]}'
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/1602/comments?per_page=100" \
--jq '.[] | [.user.login, .commit_id, .path, (.line // 0 | tostring), .body] | `@tsv`'
echo '== `#1603` file list and diff =='
gh pr view 1603 --repo "$repo" --json files,commits,comments,reviews \
--jq '{files: [.files[] | {path, additions, deletions}], commits: [.commits[] | {oid: .oid, messageHeadline: .messageHeadline}], reviews: [.reviews[] | {author: .author.login, state: .state, commit: .commit.oid}], comments: [.comments[] | {author: .author.login, body: .body}]}'
gh pr diff 1603 --repo "$repo" --color=never
echo '== `#1603` exact-head check runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/2b07c42e99c98d006b60f527576025bf49b91855/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | [.name, .status, .conclusion, .details_url] | `@tsv`'Length of output: 34622
Finding —
이 동작은 해당 PR의 fail-closed customer-copy 목표와 일치하지 않습니다.
|
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
Exact head
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
dec3cecdd2b523a3fd44b5f8e4da193743e7cb39. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Required Noema Review/noema-review: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34203689952/job/101991293808)
- noema-review check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34203689952/job/101991293808)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
OpenCode Review Overview
|
|
Canonical gap-ledger handoff, 2026-09-08: please incorporate on the next ordinary source successor rather than allowing parallel edits. (1) NetworkGraph #1593 live branch drift deleted |
Canonical ledger refresh handoff — 2026-09-08
Fresh deltas that the next canonical ledger commit must reconcile from live authority:
The current ledger head |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
Gap-ledger handoff for Sentinel root-cause issue #1666 / repair PR #1667. Please keep Current #1667 topology after ordinary adoption of canonical dependency/security owner: base RED/fix: source-order RED Delivery remains FAIL: ancestry merge |
|
Follow-up for #1666/#1667: exact head is now This post-retarget substantive head has 0 PR-triggered workflow runs, which makes the delivery gate unambiguous: predecessor |
|
#1667 current-head update: CodeRabbit's valid 61aec6b review finding showed that disconnected keyword assertions could pass while the guidance contradicted the sink-evidence rule. Repair |
|
Baseline handoff for current Sentinel lane; please keep
New evidence since the prior handoff: a second exact-range review found the SMTP CRLF regression vacuous. RED Do not record this as delivery-complete: exact |
|
Exact-head correction to the Sentinel handoff: #1667 advanced through cleanup to |
|
Gap-ledger handoff — Naruon #1587 now has a verified current-head repository RED that materially refines the stacked-PR CI gap. Exact #1587 head Security Scan on the same exact head is independently RED only on inherited |
|
Gap-ledger handoff for #1587 (2026-09-12): exact head is now Current evidence: exact-head Application CI backend job Do not record Dependency Review as passing: no local Dependency Review PR run has materialized for |
|
Gap-ledger handoff update: #1600 has now been ordinary-restacked onto current #1587 without force. Exact feature-base tuple is A real synchronize event on this feature-base PR has materialized Application CI |
|
Canonical ledger refresh — 2026-09-12 current-head corrections; please fold into the next ordinary
|
Restore the protected develop ledger blob on this branch. PR #1602 remains the sole writer for docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md while the complete dependency and regression-test delta stays in ancestry.
Advance the canonical ledger to 1.7 with the exact #1623 owner head/tree, test evidence, recreated checks, and remaining review gate. The dependency branch no longer writes this file.
|
#1623 owner-evidence refresh for the canonical Gap ledger (read-only handoff; do not copy product source):
Please advance |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
aef76075da993d820b34223898cfa0db51d7baea. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Required Noema Review/noema-review: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34688938387/job/103540983220)
- noema-review check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34688938387/job/103540983220)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
|
#1623 ledger handoff update for canonical single writer — no competing baseline source write. Current owner identity remains Required Strix run Record this as owner-side review-gateway RED, not a Naruon dependency/security finding and not a successful Strix receipt. Evidence has been handed to |
|
Gap-ledger handoff (single-writer only; no competing file edit):
Please keep these execution/review boundaries code-current in the next canonical baseline update. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
daabfe2ef832cb0250bf974701519afb5c683127. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Required Noema Review/noema-review: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34696903661/job/103562946901)
- noema-review check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34696903661/job/103562946901)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
|
Canonical ledger handoff for the latest PostgreSQL/CI evidence; please fold this into the single-writer baseline rather than letting another branch edit
Do not record either lane as GREEN yet: #1587 is blocked by canonical migration-owner integration, and #1486 is both two parent commits behind and still has the test-isolation RED. |
Current authority — 2026-09-12
develop@042b0c70531b229af3acbd0421a2f23098d848b3daabfe2ef832cb0250bf974701519afb5c6831275874c471c5dcd91cbf959e037a545ffff83b8449docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdonlyCurrent baseline 1.9 overlay
Commit
daabfe2integrates the latest exact topology and delivery evidence without copying product source: #1623 Docker is now GREEN while its CodeQL admission remains RED; #1672 has five repository workflows GREEN and CodeQL RED; #1662, #1659 and #1667 remain on predecessor #1623 head17a7618with no exact-head PR runs; #1587 and #1600 record the verified stacked-local-CI admission boundary. Predecessor0ab26dfreceipts do not authorize this moved head. Current-head CodeRabbit approval is now present; Application CI, Security, Semgrep, and Bandit are GREEN, while Docker is still running and CodeQL is queued. Those non-terminal checks still prohibit merge.Dependency and tool-succession overlay
Commits
4fd0a9adand0ab26df8advance the canonical baseline to 1.8 and bind the owner CodeQL pending-verdict RCA. It records #1623 RED8175f7f→ GREEN9d6d1e0/ treed99f83fc, Nano ID3.3.19, and local security/product validation. It also records stacked Draft #1672 exactf826fde/ tree9f655a2b, its two RED→GREEN review repairs, preserved concurrent commit5f480d6, zero unresolved threads, local validation, and remaining URL/hash/strict-JSON owner overlaps. Owner CodeQL run 34695440148 is a pending-verdict admission failure with successful authenticated dispatch, not a SARIF source finding. New #1602 exact-head workflows and independent review are required; no predecessor result is transferred.Predecessor frontend dependency owner single-writer overlay
Commit
aef76075advances the canonical baseline to 1.7 and records #1623 exact owner repaird8327d4904f38588b6b6883338aafb575256a19b/ tree5d80c6927cac1678a31e7fbab24e68a0d541fef0. It records that the dependency branch restored the protected-developledger blob after a competing write and stale-head claim, while preserving all dependency/test ancestry. Fresh owner-focused validation is 20 passed with warnings as errors; recreated owner and ledger exact-head Checks plus independent approval remain required. No predecessor evidence authorizes merge.Reply-SLA evidence overlay
Commit
183d66badvances the single-writer baseline to version 1.6 and records #1670 exact heade17bbc2/ tree820fc29. It binds the structured conflict-code RED→GREEN evidence, focused tests and remaining protected-integration gates without copying product source or predecessor Checks. New #1602 exact-head workflows and independent review are pending; predecessor4450b97evidence below remains historical only.Direct canonical repair
The baseline had described Search owner #1603 at predecessor
622dc08d..., despite its live exact head having advanced to462b134acf858061019d3ffe37b7b3d60e6f7e74. Ordinary child commit4450b97repairs that stale-current claim on the existing single-writer branch.The refreshed row records:
Colleaguenormalization, all four bounded customer action translations, and neutral fail-closed copy for unknown values;462b134...;.github#1929, plus failed OpenCode/Noema gates, absent qualifying current-head approval and absent durable responsive-browser inspection;At that predecessor, baseline version was 1.5, observed 2026-09-09. The prior valid owner-succession evidence from
0811b6e...remains in ancestry and unchanged. No force-push, destructive rebase, competing ledger writer, gate weakening or historical-evidence transfer was used.Predecessor exact-head evidence boundary
For predecessor
4450b97b..., all repository-owned PR workflows were terminal-success; none is transferred to current183d66b...:34249620626— success34249621041— success34249620684— success34249620594— success34249620552— success34249620774— successcoverage-source-tree/coverage-evidence— successCodeRabbit submitted predecessor-head
APPROVEDat 2026-09-08T16:16:55Z and the predecessor inline review-thread count was zero. That approval is historical evidence and does not apply to current183d66b....OpenCode — terminal CHANGES_REQUESTED, no Naruon source finding
The first exact-head
opencode-reviewcheck failed before its dispatched verdict existed. The authenticated current-head verdict later arrived at 2026-09-08T16:31:14Z as CHANGES_REQUESTED for4450b97...; its only HIGH finding is the same-head failedRequired Noema Review/noema-review. It does not identify a defect indocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. The check remains fail-closed until the required peer gate is clean. Do not manufacture a no-op requeue commit.Noema — terminal owner-path failure
Required Noema Review run
34249618694, job102140984266, is failure on this exact head. The job successfully validated the live head, minted its repository-scoped reviewer token, provisioned.github@7fd571dbcdbae6acf29d8f4ee704d7ba6297e4db, vendored contextual-orchestrator414f22973658c4ddc3d4320fcf7acd9b4e8ba991, and used onlymodel=orchestrator/freewith caller attempts=1.The sidecar admitted 59 free routes / selected 24, encountered multiple provider 429/404/timeout outcomes, eventually reported one ready preflight route and a successful gateway chat/completions preflight, but the actual Noema verdict request then failed closed with HTTP 429 after 155.6 s,
phase=response_error, served modeldeepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-flash-0731. Artifact publication succeeded. This is not evidence for a paid, local or direct-provider fallback and is not a Naruon source fix.Fresh reproduction has been handed to canonical owner contextual-orchestrator#1106.
.github#2042remains the consumer bridge-removal path after immutable owner release;.github#2035remains review-publication scope. Completion is owner RED → immutable CO release →.githubreleased-version bump/bridge deletion → unchanged Naruon exact-head required-review GREEN.strixon this exact head is terminal skipped, not positive execution evidence; do not record it as a passing review.Succession and merge boundary
#1611 remains open/Draft until protected-tree verification proves its valid owner-handoff evidence is fully inherited and no unique valid delta remains. Merge #1602 only when current
0ab26df8...has every then-live required context terminal-success, zero valid unresolved current-head findings/threads, and a qualifying independent approval. New exact-head evidence is pending, so every predecessor approval and repository-owned workflow result remains historical and does not authorize merge.No self-approval, bypass/admin merge, force-push, destructive rebase, dummy/no-op requeue commit, synthetic status, central-workflow copy, authorization widening, provider/model fallback expansion, second ledger writer or gate weakening.
Summary by CodeRabbit